When playing with a
partner with whom you haven’t discussed every possible bid in every
situation it occasionally happens that one of you makes a bid that
relies on partner knowing some of the lesser known “standard” bids.
Since that happened to me twice in one session I thought I’d
write down all the ones I could think of and update it so that my
partners at least have a hymn book!
Of course you can agree anything you like but unless you do
these bids will fox your partner unless you follow some rules.
Being tabular
minded here it is. You
are South partner North:
|
Bidding sequence
|
Meaning and
explanation
|
|
South
|
West
|
North
|
East
|
|
|
1NT / 2NT
|
Pass
|
4NT
|
|
If you are
maximum bid 6NT otherwise pass.
It shows a
hand not suitable for a suit contract unless you have a very
good five card suit – probably North has 4-3-3-3 or 4-4-3-2
or 5-3-3-2 with a good doubleton.
Partner
will have enough HCP to make 33-34 if you are maximum.
i.e 20 over 1NT (12-14) or 12 over 2NT.
|
|
1NT / 2NT
|
Pass
|
5NT
|
|
Bid 6NT
unless you are maximum in which case investigate 7NT or 7 of
a suit. Unlike
the previous this shows AT LEAST enough points for slam i.e.
34ish opposite a minimum (22 over 1NT, 14 over 2NT).
As before he will not have a good five card suit.
|
|
Pass
|
1©
|
3©
|
|
Partner has
seven or eight tricks in his own hand but has no stop in the
opponents’ suit (hearts).
If you have a stop bid 3NT otherwise choose a minor.
Usually applies when you have already passed.
Do not confuse with Michaels.
|
|
Pass
|
Pass
|
4NT
|
|
Irrespective of your choice of Blackwood variety this asks
for specific aces.
With none bid 5§,
with one bid 5¨,
5©,
5ª
or 6§.
With two bid 5NT.
With more call a doctor.
|
|
Pass
Double
|
1NT
|
2©
|
3©
|
Your double
shows a high honour in hearts (but not necessarily anything
else) and tells your partner it is safe to lead his suit.
By the same token failure to double denies a high
honour. It can
occur in many different situations, not just that shown.
If you use
“competitive doubles” you lose this meaning.
|
|
1§
3§
4¨
|
Pass
Pass
|
1©
3©
|
Pass
Pass
|
4¨
cannot be a suit otherwise you would have reversed into 2¨
rather than bid 3§.
So it is a cue bid agreeing hearts.
|
|
1§
3§
3ª
|
Pass
Pass
|
1©
3©
|
Pass
Pass
|
3ª
cannot be a suit otherwise you would have bid 1ª
or 2ª
rather than bid 3§.
But is it a
cue bid agreeing hearts?
This one is not so clear and should be treated as
showing stoppers in spades but not diamonds and looking for
3NT. If you
subsequently bid 4©
the meaning reverts to a cue bid as in the previous example.
|
|
5©
|
|
|
|
You are
asking partner to bid 6©
holding one top honour in hearts and 7©
with two.
A typical hand might be:
ªA K;
©Q J 10 9 8 7 6 5;
¨ void;
§A K Q.
The only
time I used this bid my partner bid 6©
with something like:
ªQ J x;
©x x;
¨A K Jx x;
§J x x.
It was not a success!
|
|
1©
|
|
5©
|
|
Similar.
He is not worried about any other suit than hearts.
You should bid 6©
with two top honours and 7©
with three.
Your partner will have something like:
ªA x;
©J 10 9 8 7;
¨A K 10 8 7 6;
§void
There is no
other easy way of finding out what you have.
ªJ x x;
©A K x x;
¨Q x;
§K Q x x is virtually a laydown for six and
50% for seven while
ªK Q J;
©Q 6 5 4;
¨J 5 4;
§A K Q x is one off despite your 16 points.
You can
show variations on this theme by bidding 6©
with two top honours but only four cards and 6§
or 6¨
(or 5NT) with five or six.
But that is for agreement.
You don’t want to play 7©
opposite the hand above with
ªK Q J;
©K Q 6 5 4 3 2;
¨Q x;
§A!
Or you can play it asking for just the two top
honours.
|
|
|
4ª
|
4NT
|
|
Most good
players use a double of 4ª
to show a good hand and not for takeout unless partner is
very shapely.
So this bid asks partner to bid a good suit.
North is probably two suited so you should choose the
lower if you have a choice.
It is NOT just for the minors he could have hearts
and diamonds.
If you bid 5§
he will bid 5¨
asking you to choose.
Similarly, if you bid 5¨
and partner 5©
he also has clubs.
The sort of
hand you should have is
ªvoid;
© K Q 10 8 6 5;
¨K J 10 9 8;
§ Q 4.
At unfavourable vulnerability you need more.
|