|
|
| 17 Aggressive bidding and delicate play | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First, the bidding. West doubled to show a good lead and a possible suit to compete. North revalued his hand and could hardly be better in support of hearts. Even if South is seriously weak (unlikely since both opponents had passed once) 3© should be a fair contract. North has no wasted values in diamonds and his hand has good controls. After the opponents had cashed two diamonds and switched to a spade from East, West won and returned a trump. The whole hand revolves round the club suit. The only way it can be kept to one loser is either by force if the cards are very favourable or by an end-play. Since the opponents have §10 the only layout where declarer can make it if the clubs are 3-3 is if West has §10 and either player has §K Q. Then if declarer can end in hand and play a small club towards dummy the defence is powerless. That also succeeds if West has a singleton honour or if East wins §K or §Q and is then end-played (with an original holding of §Q 10 x or §K Q x) but declarer still needs to get it right. By far the best way to play the hand is to hope that one defender holds §Q x or §K x and cannot or does not unblock. Declarer should win the trump, win a spade, ruff a spade, cross to §A (looking as innocent as possible), ruff another spade and play a trump to hand. A club is played and declarer hopes that whoever wins the trick has neither a trump nor a club to play. Being a tabular sort of analyst these are the different layouts which are worth considering:
If trumps are 3-1 the table changes a little as noted in the last column. Declarer should still keep to the original line (cash §A early) but will fail if
Of course, at the table none of these occurred! |